Peer Review Policies

Manuscript Evaluation

• All submitted manuscripts are first screened by the Editor to ensure compliance with WeAvecU’s Author Guidelines and alignment with the journal’s aims and scope.
• Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage for the following reasons:
• The research is outside the journal’s scope or
• The article lacks scientific rigor or is overly
• The manuscript is poorly presented, with unclear methods or
• The language is inadequate or the content is highly

Final Decision

• The Editor communicates the final decision (acceptance, revision, or rejection) to the author, along with recommendations and reviewer feedback.
• Editorial decisions are based solely on academic merit and relevance, independent of any commercial or financial interests.

Confidentiality and Ethics

• All manuscripts and reviews are treated as
• Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest and decline assignments if unqualified or unable to review
• The integrity and anonymity of the review process are strictly maintained